"sensible regulation" is a talking point, but provides 0 argument of what you actually mean, "sensible gun laws"... it's propaganda.
-
-
So nothing. You can't provide a single 'sensible regulation'.
-
what? you haven’t heard of Estonia before? no wonder you’re that naive when it comes to sensible regulations.https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/estonia-could-offer-its-own-ico/ …
-
ok good. we have something now. hah. like pulling teeth! So you think it's sensible to hand over 100% control of crypto to gov. Got it.
-
no. you’re the one imagining that. all i’m saying is that sensible regulations = regulation that adopt to changing technology.
-
Your argument of what is a 'sensible regulation' is Estonia owning 100% control of an ICO.... that's not sensible, it's tyranny.
-
that’s just one example. sensible regulation = reducing friction of blockchain/crypto adoption. there will be many forms.
-
there will be many blockchains, DLTs. cryptos. it’s naive to think that there’s going to be one blockchain to rule them all.
-
if you can’t hold that multiple perspectives and cognitive dissonance in your own brain then you’re not looking at the big picture.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
>you don't understand what 'sensible regs' for btc should be then you don't understand laws no point. Who cares about understanding laws?
-
no wonder you’re that naive on the sensibility and reasonableness of laws. carry on.
-
lol. still won't provide an example of these so called 'sensible' laws.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.