Why? There is no evidence that govs regulating money has ever been proven beneficial.
talk to any businesseses adopting cryptos and ask them about their first concern. hint: clear and sensible regulations.
-
-
quit saying "sensible regulations". It seriously means NOTHING. wtf are you even talking about?
-
if you don’t understand that term then you don’t understand laws.
-
So nothing. You can't provide a single 'sensible regulation'.
-
what? you haven’t heard of Estonia before? no wonder you’re that naive when it comes to sensible regulations.https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/estonia-could-offer-its-own-ico/ …
-
ok good. we have something now. hah. like pulling teeth! So you think it's sensible to hand over 100% control of crypto to gov. Got it.
-
no. you’re the one imagining that. all i’m saying is that sensible regulations = regulation that adopt to changing technology.
-
Your argument of what is a 'sensible regulation' is Estonia owning 100% control of an ICO.... that's not sensible, it's tyranny.
-
that’s just one example. sensible regulation = reducing friction of blockchain/crypto adoption. there will be many forms.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.