Why? There is no evidence that govs regulating money has ever been proven beneficial.
-
-
-
you think businesses will adopt cryptos without sensible regulation? good luck with that.
-
"sensible regulation" is a talking point, but provides 0 argument of what you actually mean, "sensible gun laws"... it's propaganda.
-
tell that to Bitcoin Core Devs who are appealing to the SEC. good luck!
-
It will fail... You should be telling BCore 'good luck', they're the ones that will need it.
-
only way for any Bitcoin fork to get mass adoption is through big businesses/exchanges. those institutions are beholden to regulations.
-
It's just false. >anyway any business gets mass adoption is through big businesses or regulations. Yet, small businesses become big w/o it.
-
In fact, if you look at new big businesses, they spring up where there is the least amount of other big business & regulations.
- 13 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
It's inevitable that the parasites will suck new blood. But they are less than necessary.
-
they are necessary but not sufficient. no big businesses will touch cryptos without clear and sensible regulations.
-
Too late. They already are because they know that crypto doesn't need regulations. It is self-regulating and algorithmic.
-
i’m not talking about regulating cryptos. i’m talking about regulating interfacing with cryptos! big difference.
-
that’s why i’m more aligned with
@OverstockCEO with his small “l” libertarian outlook.https://www.pcmag.com/article/350253/overstock-ceo-patrick-byrne-talks-blockchain-and-making-hist …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I for one am not interested in the kind of main stream adoption that comes with "sensible regulation" written by the parasite class.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.