@MrHodl blockchain consenus is a social construct, even if ordering is immutible. And many think that's just fine. I do. Do you?
-
-
Replying to @compricadev @eric_lombrozo and
That will have to change. It was probably always a lie.
2 replies 2 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @compricadev @eric_lombrozo and
I think it does. I'm watching it happen. People are signalling core on their Twitter profile, wearing core-hats, etc. Team Pride is ok
3 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @compricadev @derose and
Indeed. "UASF" hats were, strictly speaking, "anti-core"!
2 replies 1 retweet 14 likes -
Replying to @giacomozucco @compricadev and
That's going too far. Most of Core supported BIP148, and even those who didn't support UASF as a concept.
1 reply 1 retweet 24 likes -
Replying to @LukeDashjr @giacomozucco and
I think at best we can say is that the UASF concept had wide support, but BIP148 lacked consensus among Bitcoin Core developers.
3 replies 3 retweets 37 likes -
Replying to @eric_lombrozo @LukeDashjr and
If “users” had it their way, we would have had a chain split on 1 August...
14 replies 3 retweets 14 likes
Users are third-class citizens in most, if not all, crypto projects. their strength is their collective vote of using or not using a crypto.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.