People will try to tell you that Bitcoin was not complete. They will say SegWit and other things were needed. I say they are spreading false information. The heart of Bitcoin - the protocol, was and is complete.pic.twitter.com/LAXd6KUbRb
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
i’ve read email exchanges between Mike & Satoshi. but is there a doc wherein Satoshi clearly expressed his disapproval of L2 scaling & why?
There is no disapproval. It is just not needed
that’s what i figured. otherwise, Satoshi would’ve included L2 in his orig design. no mention of it suggests it wasn’t part of the design
to L2 or not is the crux of Bitcoin scaling war. if Satoshi was a team & @NickSzabo4 was part of that team then the divide started way back.
Nick had no idea of Bitcoin until 2010. He was too engrossed in his eGold idea. So the idea of replaceable transactions existed and with IP2IP exchange it could work well for some payment channels.
interesting. gotta wonder why Nick is theorized as part of the team. btw, i lean towards the theory that Satoshi Nakamoto was a team 
Nick was working on bit gold. To the press it sounds alike. He also had several good ideas concerning smart contracts. So 2 plus 2 and return 97... It was like the idea of 3 researchers being linked as they used the term hash in an unrelated patent
The team would be @ProfFaustus & Hal Finney
Hal is deceased but his family are not. It is not a good idea to stir this.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.