-
-
Replying to @ToneVays
And if less than 50% support BIP148 on Aug 1, then won't there be a contentious HF?
12 replies 2 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @ErikVoorhees @ToneVays
Huh?!? HF = less restrictive protcol rule. Having < 50% doesn't magically turn a sf into hf
1 reply 0 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @francispouliot_ @ToneVays
Is this true or false: If UASF/Bip148 doesn't have majority hashpower support, there is likelihood of contentious HF.
9 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @ErikVoorhees @francispouliot_
To me this is False.
@BITMAINtech scared the shit out of the market by threatening to initiate a HF if UASF gains traction on Aug 1st3 replies 0 retweets 29 likes -
So you believe risk of HF is very low on Aug 1, even though majority of hashpower doesn't support UASF/Bip148? Really?
5 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Yes, it has to be really low, like less than 5% (again, this is my opinion, i'm not a dev), but I'm stacking my Life Savings on it !!!
1 reply 3 retweets 37 likes -
Erik you can almost guarantee Segwit and avoid HF with shapeshift adopting bip148 - miners would be crazy to not support your chain!
1 reply 5 retweets 36 likes -
ShapeShift supports SegWit2x, as does almost every major company and miner in the industry. IMHO it's best chance of SegWit happening.
19 replies 4 retweets 32 likes -
It also has the best chance of a bug rendering the entire
#Bitcoin#Blockchain useless w/ 0 competent devs to fix set bug. I'll take#UASF2 replies 3 retweets 19 likes
opinion is cheap. how about you put a smart contract bet on it? #JustForkItAlready
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.