blog update: The Psi Wars Just Went Nuclear on TED ~ http://www.c4chaos.com/2013/04/the-psi-wars-just-went-nuclear-on-ted/ …
#TED #TEDx #psi
@Mumon7 read your article on remote viewing. I don’t agree. what about Persinger’s experiment with Swann? isn’t that a replication?
-
-
@c4chaos 2) I was looking at Targ's paper in the Proceedings; & Persinger's work is not without criticism (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Persinger …) -
@Mumon7 oh please, a criticism doesn’t invalidate a published paper. unless you would claim that Persinger fabricated his results. -
@c4chaos 2) And simply because a paper is published doesn't mean it has value. 90+% of all published papers by IEEE aren't very valuable. -
@Mumon7 no it doesn’t. but it’s one of the indicators that there is something to it. Targ and Puthoff are scientists. not charlatans. -
@c4chaos Having has a Ph.D. doesn't mean much outside the Ph.D.'s field of expertise. Even if they're at a prestigious university! -
@Mumon7 RV has been replicated. many times in the lab. here’s just one. ~ http://www.scientificexploration.org/journal/jse_10_1_nelson.pdf … and Persinger has done it too.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@c4chaos 2 replies: 1) If I were to do this, I'd do so with a protocol that was *randomized*, like "rock paper scissors" via computer... -
@Mumon7 the remote viewing protocol was randomized and double blind. watch Puthoff’s presentation. ~ http://youtu.be/7HeZxQYEQRw -
@c4chaos You'd have to completely only 1 human in the experimentto do this right. -
@Mumon7 they did. his name was Ingo Swann.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.