no. they are all related. check my original post. bottom line: Amazon should pay living wages because they are getting big subsidies from the govt. it’s a simple equation.
-
-
I thought you watched the video i posted? why can’t you see the connection? if Amazon pays a living wage then its employees will not qualify to receive food stamps. hence The Stop Bezos Act. here, let me spell it clearly. http://www.latimes.com/business/hiltzik/la-fi-hiltzik-sanders-bezos-20180911-story.html …pic.twitter.com/XP1k1NDNUf
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LeoCrespoTweets @AmazonFCSarah
my question is simple: do you want taxpayers to pay for food stamps of Amazon employees or would rather have Amazon pay for it? my answer: I’d rather have Amazon pay the tax, OR Amazon pay their employees living wages so they don’t depend on food stamps.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LeoCrespoTweets @AmazonFCSarah
there are consequences for everything. i guess I’m projecting myself at Jeff Bezos position of power. bottom line: if I’m the richest person in the world, i won’t let my employees go on food stamps and will pay them a living wage before I replace them all with robots
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
subsidies are put in place so companies will give back to communities by paying good wages and creating more jobs. if companies don’t fulfill those conditions then it defeats the purpose of subsidies.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.