a solution is for companies to pay living wage to their employees (e.g. Costco does this already) or pay back the food stamp subsides to the tax payers. Amazon Gets Tax Breaks While Its Employees Rely on Food Stamps, New Data Showshttps://theintercept.com/2018/04/19/amazon-snap-subsidies-warehousing-wages/ …
my question is simple: do you want taxpayers to pay for food stamps of Amazon employees or would rather have Amazon pay for it? my answer: I’d rather have Amazon pay the tax, OR Amazon pay their employees living wages so they don’t depend on food stamps.
-
-
there are consequences for everything. i guess I’m projecting myself at Jeff Bezos position of power. bottom line: if I’m the richest person in the world, i won’t let my employees go on food stamps and will pay them a living wage before I replace them all with robots

-
Tweet unavailable
-
subsidies are put in place so companies will give back to communities by paying good wages and creating more jobs. if companies don’t fulfill those conditions then it defeats the purpose of subsidies.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.