the point is the video. you didn’t watch the video, obviously.
no. they are all related. check my original post. bottom line: Amazon should pay living wages because they are getting big subsidies from the govt. it’s a simple equation.
-
-
I thought you watched the video i posted? why can’t you see the connection? if Amazon pays a living wage then its employees will not qualify to receive food stamps. hence The Stop Bezos Act. here, let me spell it clearly. http://www.latimes.com/business/hiltzik/la-fi-hiltzik-sanders-bezos-20180911-story.html …pic.twitter.com/XP1k1NDNUf
-
Tweet unavailable
-
my question is simple: do you want taxpayers to pay for food stamps of Amazon employees or would rather have Amazon pay for it? my answer: I’d rather have Amazon pay the tax, OR Amazon pay their employees living wages so they don’t depend on food stamps.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
there are consequences for everything. i guess I’m projecting myself at Jeff Bezos position of power. bottom line: if I’m the richest person in the world, i won’t let my employees go on food stamps and will pay them a living wage before I replace them all with robots

- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
is so childish about that? you are handwaving that fact that other big companies (like Costco) are already paying employees living wages, while not receiving big subsides from govt. that’s why you don’t hear people complaining about Costco.
-
I haven’t even mentioned about the abusive conditions of Amazon warehouse. but yeah, that’s a different topic than living wages
https://youtu.be/wGdMbI6ZCTY
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.