Apparently, that is just what the IOTA Foundation has tricked you into believing. Here I have evidence of that actually never being the plan. I'm sorry they lied to you. Do you understand that I have been trying to protect people like you from this?https://twitter.com/ercwl/status/996204967760457730?s=19 …
-
-
who cares! eric, you see lies and deceit behind every tree someone hurt you pretty bad, they lied to you a long time and you fell for it, hard you now have a deficit of trust trusting too much, gullibility, is a real problem, true so is a pathological level of distrust eric
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Eric Wall Retweeted _GIBUS_ 🐲[MNML-ist] 🐉 🚀[HODL] ⚡️
All the people who invested in IOTA based on the false claims made by its founders care. I have hundreds of messages from people personally thanking me for showing what the lies were, and how IOTA is centralized and have no viable decentralized model. See:https://twitter.com/_GIBUS_/status/875152070705328128?s=19 …
Eric Wall added,
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Let's go further than your accusations. Let's say: the security model of
#IOTA is completely overhauled. It's growing pains. All of#DLT is in its infancy, there are many twists coming. On the basis of your harsh paranoid standards, you need to give up on the entire#DLT space1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I follow DLT projects where the people working on solutions are honest and transparent. IOTA is not only non-functional, but also opaque and deceitful, sometimes outright malicious, and its community is either dumb or toxic. Therefore I will give up on IOTA in particular.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ercwl @accretionist and
by your opinion
$IOTA is: - non-functional - opaque, deceitful - community is dumb, toxic - a scam FACTS: - IF is a regulated entity in Germany - global corporates already doing test beds - big names in IoT are IF members - community is coming up with use cases facts > opinion
3 replies 3 retweets 20 likes -
Replying to @c4chaos @accretionist and
In a perfect world, the things you wrote would have been mutually exclusive, but sadly, we don't live in a perfect world.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ercwl @accretionist and
~C4Chaos Retweeted Daniel Larimer
in a perfect world, we’d have an accurate and agreed upon definition of “decentralization.” sadly,
#decentralization is being thrown around like everyone understands it.@bytemaster7 nailed it.https://twitter.com/bytemaster7/status/966882352994516992?s=20 …~C4Chaos added,
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @c4chaos @accretionist and
You are trying to make IOTA seem legit by blurring lines. I can offer you a very simple requirement. In a decentralized cryptocurrency, the confirmation of transactions are independent of the actions of a single entity. Most cryptocurrencies pass this requirement, IOTA does not.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like
not blurring the lines. my view is that the *entire* crypto space is still a proof of concept running high on speculation and idealization of the concept of “decentralization.” by your definition, $EOS is decentralized. so when $IOTA Coo is turned off, is it decentralized?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.