you demand these things but you never exhibit these behaviors yourself. you revel in mindless negativity, you have no informed criticism in your words you calling IOTA a scam eric is about the quality of your character, not about IOTA
-
-
Replying to @accretionist @c___f___b
Do you think IOTA is 100% decentralized with the current Coordinator-based model?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ercwl @c___f___b
Coordinator is about finality, not permissioning, nor centralization.
#IOTA works without it, but low throughput means vulnerability. High throughput means it can be turned off, which is the plan. All#DLT projects have a training wheels problem starting out Be honest Eric.1 reply 1 retweet 13 likes -
Replying to @accretionist @c___f___b
So your answer to my question is yes?
4 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @ercwl @c___f___b
Read my tweet genius. It's a beta project with great promise. If you want to throw sh*t bombs of mindless negativity, be my guest. But I think that says more about your personality than about
#IOTA Eric. "Wright brothers built flimsy weak crap, what a scam. I'm so edgy lol."1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @accretionist @c___f___b
So why don't write that it's a beta project with great promise then? Why lie and claim it is 100% decentralized?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @ercwl @c___f___b
#IOTA can work without Coordinator right now. There is no permissioning. There is no central control. Coordinator is about FINALITY. Do you understand? It is temporary training wheels that all#DLT projects need in some form because of attacks. The lie is "IOTA = database"1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @accretionist @c___f___b
Eric Wall Retweeted Come-from-Beyond
None of what you are saying now addresses the issue. The quoted text was a lie. That makes IOTA a scam. And no, IOTA can't work right now at all without the Coordinator since it is using CPU-bound PoW, see below.https://twitter.com/c___f___b/status/996006974188867584?s=19 …
Eric Wall added,
Come-from-Beyond @c___f___bReplying to @ercwl @SteenhuizenLind and 3 othersThat's correct if you mean CPU-bound PoW and incorrect if you mean Network-bound one. Be more specific, please. BTW, you can't be unaware of#IOTA plans to migrate to network-bound PoW, we discussed that with you IIRC. Why are you forgetting about info which is against your PoV?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ercwl @c___f___b
"A project in beta isn't 100% foolproof yet, therefore scam." No. The difference between what you want to see, and what
#IOTA currently is, is time. "You will fail, your intent is dishonest." Thanks for your vote of no confidence. That is about your personality, not#IOTA .1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @accretionist @c___f___b
I never said IOTA is a scam because it isn't foolproof. I am saying it is a scam because it is claiming to be foolproof, when that isn't true. That makes it a lie, and a scam. This isn't a complicated point I am making.
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
let’s use that logic on Bitcoin: - they said it’s anonymous - they said it’s for p2p electronic cash - they said it’s for the unbanked - they said it would scale is Bitcoin a scam?
-
-
- they said Bitcoin is “decentralized” - they said Segwit will fix scaling - they said Lightning will fix scaling - they said Bitcoin will free people from banks and governments is Bitcoin a scam?
0 replies 1 retweet 2 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.