Many see you as a competitor to a multi-billion dollar blockchain project. Sharing false information "you found on Telegram" is irresponsible, IMO. If you understand the EOS project, you'd already know how the constitution outlines BPs work with arbitrators for dispute resolution
-
-
Replying to @lukestokes
It was blantantly irresponsible for Dan Larimer to draft a blog post falsely claiming that iohk research didn't cite or even plagiarized his work on DPoS. It's also blatantly irresponsible for http://block.one to raise 4 billion dollars with no fiduciary responsibility
1 reply 1 retweet 7 likes -
Replying to @IOHK_Charles
Red herring and ad hominem. This isn't about Dan or the speculators that made Block One rich. Why ask for my individual opinion on EOS? Go read the Github code. Anyone who has been following what EOS is doing understands the level of governance responsibility BPs have.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @lukestokes
I have read the code. The performance claims are lies. EOS cannot run at several hundred thousand TPS. As for governance, unless its also fake news, less than 1 percent control more than 51 percent of the stake. You are ruled by an oligarchy
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @IOHK_Charles @lukestokes
this is a different thread of conversation which makes bold publlic claim that
@bytemaster7 is lying about$EOS scaling and performance capabilities. i guess this can be settled only with time as the network grows and EOS scaling roadmap milestones are reached, or not.1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Use commonsense https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.01626 was written by some of the best experts in the space and they are getting 50 TPS. Tuning can certainly give you an order of magnitude, but not 4. Are IBM via hyperledger and the broader distributed systems community all incompetent?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @c4chaos @lukestokes and
Your children's grandchildren will be using this system. Let's not curse them with sins and flaws made in haste to achieve some arbitrary vanity metric. Give them something you're proud to pass on
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @IOHK_Charles @c4chaos and
Couldn't they also be using DPOS systems like EOS, BitShares, and STEEM? There are many methods to achieving robustness and resilience. Academic papers are not the only effective approach. I'm disappointed you have not taken any responsibly for spreading fake news.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @lukestokes @c4chaos and
DPoS works and has built real products. This was never up for debate. It was proven a long time ago.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
i remember you, Charles, saying that it’s the *community* that gives real value to a project. it’s the $BTS and $STEEM communities that made #DPOS work. $EOS has the most passionate community working together. i hope to see Cardano grow a stronger community when it launches.
-
-
Replying to @c4chaos @lukestokes and
Yes I did say that and it's even more true today. And when a community accepts a governance structure that normalizes blacklisting, reversals and freezing, then it leads to an unhealthy ecosystem. It's the same when we accept civil asset forfeiture with fiat. Both are wrong
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @IOHK_Charles @c4chaos and
This sounds to me like a false dichotomy and poor comparison. Protecting property (which is arguable what has been done so far with _valid_ ECAF orders) is not unhealthy. Monopoly on violence in a geographic region backing mafia-style enforcers (police) with no due process is.
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.