When we criticise IOTA, they're all "why are you focusing on IOTA"? When we don't, it's "why so silent"?https://twitter.com/c4chaos/status/1003896918706085888 …
-
-
Sounds like you’re saying that you never expect it to go away either, then?
-
if
#Qubic delivers on its promise and gets a tipping point adoption, then there’s be no need for COO training wheels.https://iota-news.com/what-is-q-from-a-laymen-given-barney-style/ … -
Would you care to make a bet on whether Iota will still have a coordinator at the end of the year, then?
-
i don’t think
$IOTA#Qubic will be production-ready with the required volume of txns to turn off COO this year. ask me again on end of 2020. in the meantime, will you honestly answer this question from@c___f___b?https://mobile.twitter.com/c___f___b/status/1004130021986971648 … -
I’d skip the coordinator. There’s no point in having a cryptocurrency if it relies on a single trusted point of truth. Of course, I’d also build my cryptocurrency so its consensus mechanism was self-regulating, unlike IOTA’s, so it’d be much less vulnerable to 51% attacks.
-
The coordinator is about finality, not about permissionlessness/decentralization. Ask
@VitalikButerin or@VladZamfir about the difference, you (as a "classical" engineer) may not know these nuances. -
If you don’t care about permissionlessness or decentralisation, why not just skip the network and run everything through the coordinator directly? If you keep up the insults, though, I may end up simplifying my life and adding you to the ignore list.
-
This coo obsession is ridiculous. Getting rid of coo goes hand in hand with adoption. So saying you believe it cant be removed actually means you believe it wont be adopted. So whats the point with any crypto then if it does not get adopted anyway? Coo would be your least concern
- 17 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.


