When we criticise IOTA, they're all "why are you focusing on IOTA"? When we don't, it's "why so silent"?https://twitter.com/c4chaos/status/1003896918706085888 …
-
-
Is the COO still in place?
-
someone should add “Is the COO still in place” in this
$IOTA + Qubic workflow strip

pic.twitter.com/VM2iT3NfsJ
-
Sounds like you’re saying that you never expect it to go away either, then?
-
if
#Qubic delivers on its promise and gets a tipping point adoption, then there’s be no need for COO training wheels.https://iota-news.com/what-is-q-from-a-laymen-given-barney-style/ … -
Would you care to make a bet on whether Iota will still have a coordinator at the end of the year, then?
-
i don’t think
$IOTA#Qubic will be production-ready with the required volume of txns to turn off COO this year. ask me again on end of 2020. in the meantime, will you honestly answer this question from@c___f___b?https://mobile.twitter.com/c___f___b/status/1004130021986971648 … -
I’d skip the coordinator. There’s no point in having a cryptocurrency if it relies on a single trusted point of truth. Of course, I’d also build my cryptocurrency so its consensus mechanism was self-regulating, unlike IOTA’s, so it’d be much less vulnerable to 51% attacks.
-
The coordinator is about finality, not about permissionlessness/decentralization. Ask
@VitalikButerin or@VladZamfir about the difference, you (as a "classical" engineer) may not know these nuances. - 19 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
