They point to the power - and the vested interests - forestry authorities had over regulation of wildlife resources, as well as the influence of TCM in Chinese culture.
Prikaži ovu nit
Why China can’t quit its habit of eating wildlife? Here is a piece I wrote in 2016 when Wildlife Protection Law was under revision, the underlying thinking was: use, instead of protection, is the core concept. Activists had candid discussions back then:https://www.scmp.com/news/china/policies-politics/article/1910061/making-killing-killing-chinese-activists-fear-revision …
-
-
-
Some argue banning wildlife use completely would hurt grassroots relying on the industry, but a lawyer disagreed: “All language [in the draft revision] about protection is pretty vague, but all the provisions involving ‘commercial use’ are very clear. Is it the way to ‘balance’?”
Prikaži ovu nit -
The final version that was eventually adopted had toned down the overtly emphasis on “reasonable use” of wildlife, but the utilitarian belief never changed.
Prikaži ovu nit
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.