@billieeilish help him out, your music publisher shouldn't have done this, It was unnecessary
-
-
Covers are fair use (which is protected by the law); they're transformative works. Roomie's cover features NO part of the original recording. I get you're a fan of Billie but try and realize that a creator is getting screwed. She already receives royalties for writing the song.
-
Lmao but it involves her words n melody
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You clearly don't know anything about copyright law if you think covers aren't fair use, and as the other dude said he used NO PART OF THE ORIGINAL RECORDING which makes it and even weaker case. Even IF it violated her copyright she'd only be entitled to part, not 100%
-
Look nothings gonna b done about it so no point arguing
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.