Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.

This is the legacy version of twitter.com. We will be shutting it down on June 1, 2020. Please switch to a supported browser, or disable the extension which masks your browser. You can see a list of supported browsers in our Help Center.

  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
burntsushi5's profile
Andrew Gallant
Andrew Gallant
Andrew Gallant
@burntsushi5

Tweets

Andrew Gallant

@burntsushi5

I love to code.

Marlborough, MA
blog.burntsushi.net
Joined October 2016

Tweets

  • © 2020 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. boyter‏ @boyter 7 Mar 2018
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation

      Continuing to play with building the fastest possible code counter. Actually getting performance CLOSE to what ripgrep gets which is impressive since I am processing every byte. ~5 seconds to process the Linux kernel.

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
      Show this thread
    2. boyter‏ @boyter 7 Mar 2018
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation

      That's on my machine though. Ripgrep rips through it in about ~4 seconds. Looking forward to benchmark comparisons with cloc, sloccount and tokei when the time comes.

      2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
      Show this thread
    3. Andrew Gallant‏ @burntsushi5 7 Mar 2018
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @boyter

      What query are you feeding to ripgrep? 4 seconds on the Linux kernel sounds really slow to me. Take a look at the timings in the README: https://github.com/BurntSushi/ripgrep#quick-examples-comparing-tools …

      2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
    4. boyter‏ @boyter 7 Mar 2018
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @burntsushi5

      “rg a .” To force it to work harder. Running using hyper fine with 3 warmup runs and 10 runs so not measuring disk io. What’s slowing it down is I’m using WSL which is know to have disk speed issues.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    5. Andrew Gallant‏ @burntsushi5 7 Mar 2018
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @boyter

      Oh I see! Yeah that's much more believable. Try `rg '^.+$'` to make it work even harder. ;-) (It runs in just under a second on my machine, but that's an order of magnitude slower than a simple `rg PM_RESUME` for example.)

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
    6. Andrew Gallant‏ @burntsushi5 7 Mar 2018
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @burntsushi5 @boyter

      Also, note that a good chunk of that is probably going to be benchmarking output, which probably defeats some of the purpose of the comparison. If you do `rg '^.+$' -c`, which will count every match instead of printing every match, then you might get a bit closer.

      2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
    7. boyter‏ @boyter 7 Mar 2018
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @burntsushi5

      To be honest I was using ripgrep to A warm up the disk cache and B just give a reasonable idea of how fast its possible to move through the code. Noticed your comments on https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/82k9iy/loc_count_lines_of_code_quickly/ … which is what I am now benching against :)

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      Andrew Gallant‏ @burntsushi5 7 Mar 2018
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @boyter

      Great! Sounds like you're on the right track. :-)

      4:23 PM - 7 Mar 2018
      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        1. New conversation
        2. boyter‏ @boyter 7 Mar 2018
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation
          Replying to @burntsushi5

          Hope so! Never needed to write code with this level of performance requirements before. Rather refreshing way to think about things.

          1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
        3. Andrew Gallant‏ @burntsushi5 11 Mar 2018
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation
          Replying to @boyter

          w.r.t. https://github.com/boyter/scc  I really think you should be giving the `-c` flag to ripgrep. Line counters print aggregate statistics, and comparing that with a command that prints virtually every line that it prints it not particularly meaningful. :-)

          1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
        4. 7 more replies

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2020 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Imprint
        • Cookies
        • Ads info