Brainstorm with me. How plausible is it for quickcheck to break ties with rand?https://github.com/BurntSushi/quickcheck/issues/241 …
-
-
Totally! But I would argue that's good churn (keeping up with an improving ecosystem) vs bad churn with LTS (trading off current improvements or adding complexity to accommodate the past). I only maintain one lib of substance (Juniper) and we choose to do stable - 2 releases FWIW
-
I don't really agree with that characterization. To me, churn is a negative thing to be mitigated and minimized. Depending on situation and type of crate, the degree of success will vary. To me, the word "churn" doesn't really apply to LTS maintenance.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
It’s a great way for new contributors to jump in and join the community. Seen it many times since in the past I frequently made breaking changes to *ring* that require users to tweak code. It works great if/when we work together.
-
Those contributors are a non-renewable resource. Please keep this in mind.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.