Watching a talk via @hankadusikova from @CppCon on her compile-time regular expression library and... it's amazing how much C++ devs manage to fit into templates: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QM3W36COnE4 …
-
Show this thread
-
I'd love to see a comparison with re2 and Rust regex libraries though.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @RReverser @CppCon
Look at updated version of sludis with updated compilers, libraries, and CTRE too: https://compile-time.re/slides-meeting-cpp/#/7/3 … I added re2, but not rust.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @hankadusikova @CppCon
Rust regex is (or at least used to be) faster than re2 on various common patterns due to smart optimisations, so it could be still interestring to include: https://github.com/rust-lang/regex/blob/master/bench/log/05/re2-vs-rust … Great library and talk though!
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like
It would probably do well on `ABCD|DEFGH|EFGHI|A{4,}` in particular since it's amenable to literal optimizations. It will probably even use Teddy.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.