What if you add the directories to the system search indexes?
-
-
I don't care. I just dislike Windows search too much.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
-
Replying to @ben_a_adams @terrajobst and
Current PC I'm using at any time is just a vessel for temporary files; indexing them is inefficient and counter productive.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Yeah, that’s also true. I wish there was a dev mode option for that too.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I do search files locally though as GitHub search is; unusual...
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @ben_a_adams @terrajobst and
why-you-no-use-ripgrep.jpg https://github.com/BurntSushi/ripgrep/blob/master/README.md …
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @damageboy @ben_a_adams and
I also like ripgrep but McAfee hates it and consumes 100% cpu when using it
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Paxxi @damageboy and
Do you know why this happens for ripgrep but not findstr? cc
@roblourens2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @burntsushi5 @damageboy and
Would need some more testing but findstr puts no load on the disk, sits around 50-250kb/s read while ripgrep goes up to at least 10mb/s. basically ripgrep is too fast for mcafee to keep up with it
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
What happens if you run ripgrep with -j1? (Forces it to use a single thread.)
-
-
Replying to @burntsushi5 @damageboy and
It seems to scale pretty linear with thread count, -j1 ~10% -j2 ~20% -j5 ~50% on an i7 4c/4ht, around 75-90% when not specifying any thread count
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
