@skdh @_julesh_ @ejpatters @JadeMasterMath The only philosophy we will ever need: I) A model is an image of "some reality". Whether that reality is "objective", fictional, another model is of no concern here. What is of concern is that a model leaves out some parts of the ... 1/2
or formal verifiability or concerns of ethical nature is not isolated from the question of purpose. Finally IV) The whole activity of modeling can "go wrong" in multiple ways: the pre-conceived "reality" is wrong, or the reality is right but the model is wrong, or both are 5/n
-
-
"right", but the consensus on what constitutes the purpose of the modeling activity changed. This explains paradigm shift / "scientific revolution", "anything goes" but also ongoing debates. kthnxbye. 6/n=6
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
What does it mean for the preconception to be wrong but the model right?
-
Well, that the model really accurately serves anything one wanted with the wrong preconception, of course. Like those elaborate things that were thought out to prove that the sun revolves around the earth.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.