Btw did you respond to the people saying that your drawing exercise for technological unemployment should be applied not to the unemployment rate but to the labor force participation rate?
Nice way to self-test your calibration:https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/01/15/us/politics/you-draw-obama-legacy.html …
-
-
-
No, but that wouldn't work well either. LFP was roughly flat from 1948-1964, rose from 1965-1999, then started falling. What tech story does that match?
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Is there a name for these types of tests? I love it. Wish I could find more.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Wow I'm right about everything
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
I got the ending value right (within a grid line) for all but two. (debt and troops in Afghanistan). I didn't track well for the values in between though.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
How good they have not added a gadget survey to see what aggregate curves were, and by demographics and ideology?
- Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Got everything but troops close to actual.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
So cool...
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.