Can you imagine if RE worked so much better than conventional that no vote needed, that market forced it? Only possible w/ superior tech.pic.twitter.com/CzXZqSp9ds
Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Can you imagine if RE worked so much better than conventional that no vote needed, that market forced it? Only possible w/ superior tech.pic.twitter.com/CzXZqSp9ds
Except that politically fossil fuel co's give millions to our gov who subsidizes them. Nope, not political at all.
hang on son, U pay their wages U don't ask U require it of them that they REPRESENT Ur view DEMAND they act 4 ppl not industry.
You can almost taste that cash in your pocket, I see it in your eye you bad boy you
Yeah right, Jim nielson's an idiot who would vote no on saving his own grandmother from the ravenous bugblatter beast from Traal
Vote No or you will be taxed more and charged more from garbage to electric!
But we need a CLEAN RPS, #SB100 has tons of methane and has no sense of urgency… 2045 is not acceptable. We need it to be 2035!
Why? For what reason? Do not increase the price of energy utility bills that poor people and people on fixed incomes have no money to pay
CALAFORNIA .i m calling
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.