Recently I've been wondering about the limits of watching your own replays. It's quite difficult to find the root cause mistakes versus the symptoms of a mistake. It seems better to just watch pro replays, study the differences with your own play and figure out why they exist.
-
To clarify it means that they will come up with their own weaker interpretation of build orders and unit compositions to escape from the reality that their basic macro and micro skills are too weak to execute the build orders and play styles pros do. This often leads to whining.
yeah this makes sense. what sometimes happens to me is I'll follow a build until I start losing consistently to something, say a certain kind of all-in. then i'll start making "adjustments" to be "safe" that end up just being a handicap, instead of learning the proper reaction
-
-
This depends on which race you play, with zerg the reacting and holding with a "theoretical perfect drone count" can always work. Then after you hold you should slightly ahead at worse and can continue with a macro game. Then you counter greed with equal greed.
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
-
-
However its more complicated for races like terran and protoss because you need to apply pressure in the early mid game to be consistent. For example the 4 hellion 1 safe banshee into 2 tank 2 medivac tvz build and oracle phoenix into archon drop build are cases of solid pressure
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.