*citation needed
-
-
-
Replying to @shailjapatel
A single show asking the rather important question and her not being a jerk to a former president. That is not proof she pounded the drums of war. It is you making something up about a woman *not even running for city council.*
4 replies 1 retweet 32 likes -
Replying to @ahumorlessfem
Did you watch excerpts of the 10/2/02 show? Oprah insisted: 1) Iraq had weapons of mass destruction 2) Iraqis wanted the US to 'liberate' them And the only justification for giving a war criminal your platform is to hold him accountable for his atrocities.
2 replies 21 retweets 151 likes -
Replying to @shailjapatel
Once again-a single show is not proving she pounded the drums for war. But it is proving to me you are a liar so win win?
2 replies 0 retweets 19 likes -
Replying to @ahumorlessfem
Once again, did you actually watch the show excerpts? I haven't lied about anything.
1 reply 3 retweets 89 likes -
Replying to @shailjapatel
Yes, you have. Your premise: Oprah Winfrey in 2002 was a person beating the drums for war. Your proof: she had a single show about if we should go to war. She also had George W. Bush on in 2010.
6 replies 1 retweet 17 likes -
Replying to @ahumorlessfem
I see you're not willing to view the footage. Have a good day.
6 replies 3 retweets 114 likes -
Replying to @shailjapatel @ahumorlessfem
I watched the show live and remember it. I’m sorry but I agree with the woman above. You’re reaching to fit a narrative you already hold. That or you’re a paid troll.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Maybe someone paid Bill Kristol to name Oprah's war boosterism as one of his pros for her candidacy?pic.twitter.com/wUJjM2Dgob
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.