Brent KendallOvjeren akaunt

@brkend

WSJ legal affairs reporter in Washington. Native Tar Heel, with lingering accent to prove it. brent.kendall@wsj.com

Vrijeme pridruživanja: rujan 2012.
57 fotografija ili videozapisa Fotografije i videozapisi

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @brkend

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @brkend

  1. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    23. sij

    A dramatic concession of error by the prosecutor during a Third Circuit death-penalty-appeal oral argument last week.

    5 replies 46 proslijeđenih tweetova 85 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    22. sij

    The D.C. attorney general has sued Trump's inaugural committee and business, alleging the committee abused its nonprofit status by overpaying the Trump Hotel for event space. The committee paid the hotel $1M despite concerns from its event planners.

    94 proslijeđena tweeta 161 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
    Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    22. sij

    AFTER MIDNIGHT: In an extraordinary moment, Chief Justice Roberts rebukes both Trump lawyers and House managers for breaking Senate decorum. "Those addressing the Senate should remember where they are,” Roberts said. With

    49 replies 55 proslijeđenih tweetova 172 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  4. 17. sij

    "Environmental apocalypse” or not, judges can't force the government to phase out fossil fuel emissions, Ninth Circuit rules. Divided panel tosses climate suit by youngsters.

    1 proslijeđeni tweet 1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
    Poništi
  5. 16. sij

    Yes, he and a security detail will make the drive. Will probably take longer than if he walked.

    So when Roberts comes over to the Senate from SCOTUS, does he come in a car? I assume so, and I get it, but also that's literally a 1000 foot walk
    1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 8 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  6. 16. sij

    Finally, here's our separate story on DOJ and the NCAA, w . “We’re taking a close look,” Delrahim said. “We’ve let them know of our interest.”

    3 proslijeđena tweeta 3 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  7. 16. sij

    The states' Sprint-T-Mo merger case is clearly on Delrahim's mind. It's a new ballgame if Dem AGs convince a judge that concessions extracted by the feds fall short. “I think if the states win, it creates major uncertainty in M&A.”

    1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  8. 16. sij

    He's less committal on Big Tech, which suggests key decision points for DOJ are still a ways away. A golf analogy: “We’re well into the fairway of gathering data and evidence.”

    1 reply
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  9. 16. sij

    DOJ antitrust chief has a lot to say—and do—in 2020. In WSJ sit-down, Makan Delrahim pledges: - price-fixing cases against generic drug firms - criminal charges re no-poach agreements - scrutiny of NCAA on athlete pay - decision on music licensing rules

    1 reply 12 proslijeđenih tweetova 20 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    10. sij

    Fair warning (and apologies): For the next week, my twitter feed will be a binge of self-promotion. My and 's book, The Fixers, is out Tuesday. Then I will return to tweeting my colleagues' and competitors' great work and liking animal photos.

    8 replies 27 proslijeđenih tweetova 120 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  11. 8. sij

    Maryland federal judge skeptical of Trump executive order allowing states, localities to say no to refugees.

    6 proslijeđenih tweetova 7 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  12. 19. pro 2019.

    That line was attributed to "some opponents," but it definitely caught people's attention last night.

    Footnote 3 of Texas v. U.S. should be removed from the final published opinion There is no reason for a judicial decision to write that the ACA "was enacted as part of a fraud on the American people"
    1 proslijeđeni tweet 3 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  13. 19. pro 2019.

    Lots of reader emails asking if 5th Circuit ruling means tax refunds of ACA insurance-mandate penalties. Hard to explain to folks that the tax was constitutional when it cost them money, but isn’t now that Congress slashed penalty to $0.

    3 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  14. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    17. pro 2019.

    People say they have been selling trash as new on Amazon. We tried it ourselves. It turned out to be easy.

    10 proslijeđenih tweetova 7 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  15. 13. pro 2019.

    Supreme Court agrees to hear all three pending Trump appeals challenging subpoenas issued to accountants, banks for his financial records. Arguments in March 2020, expect rulings in June. WSJ story momentarily...

    1 reply 7 proslijeđenih tweetova 9 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  16. 13. pro 2019.

    Justice Department preparing to take action against Live Nation on allegations the company has violated Ticketmaster antitrust decree by trying to strong-arm concert venues. First version out, more coming.

    2 proslijeđena tweeta 1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
    Poništi
  17. 13. pro 2019.

    Supreme Court justices are expected to talk Trump and subpoenas at their private conference this morning.

    1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
    Poništi
  18. 12. pro 2019.

    A whole lotta arguing at the Fourth Circuit today over Trump and emoluments, and the left-right divide in Richmond appeared quite stark. A lemon of a lawsuit or a president above the law?

    1 proslijeđeni tweet 1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
    Poništi
  19. 10. pro 2019.

    AG Barr makes pretty clear he's not a fan of broad Section 230 immunity for internet companies, applauds Judge Katzmann’s dissent to 2nd Circuit ruling that rejected Facebook liability for allegedly connecting Hamas sympathizers.

    5 proslijeđenih tweetova 3 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  20. 9. pro 2019.

    Democrats' emoluments lawsuit vs. Trump seems likely to be tossed out by DC Circuit on grounds that lawmakers don't have standing to sue -- in part because of ruling RBG wrote for SCOTUS in June.

    4 proslijeđena tweeta 3 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi

@brkend još nije objavio nijedan Tweet.

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·