Of course "Mark Zuckerberg says his company will never be able to fully protect its platform from abuse" because they profit from it. #DeleteFacebokNowhttps://twitter.com/brianstelter/status/981655182877609984 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Facebook users are Facebook’s product, not its customers. As long as this is Facebook’s business model and execution thereof, nothing will change. There is no financial incentive to protect the privacy of its users, err, products.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
#YouTubeShooter facts: 1. Not male 2. Not “white” 3. Not a conservative 4. Is a vegan 5. Didn’t use an AR-15 6. Was not an NRA supporter 7. Was in strict gun control state 8. Was in a “gun free zone” 9. Loved her son PETA... 10. Won’t be talked about by the MSM or gun grabbers.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What about her emails, Brian? Wasn't it your best buddy Maggie Haberman, who obsessively covered every minute, and every detail of Hillary Clinton's use of her email? You people are pathetic... you are all complicit in normalizing this appalling Administration. Ps- GFYpic.twitter.com/LLA5Qerhis
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Post a boob photo on Facebook and they will flag it and put you in FB jail in minutes, but they have no way to control anything else on the platform...Surepic.twitter.com/7HWrUZJjur
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Battle? The man takes our info and sells it...ffs. No need for any facebook hacking, as long as you arrive with a fist full of cash ole Zuck will give you whatever you want.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He has used these talking points before. 2007.https://techcrunch.com/2007/12/05/zuckerberg-saves-face-apologies-for-beacon/ …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Translation " damage control 'cuz we are caught being shitty humans" bye FB.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Work FB is a scam. Like he didn’t know about the security breach. He know but he needed to protect his billions.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Suckerberg did the same thing at Harvard when Facebook was just a prototype..
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Too big to fail. They know they've got a big issue. I believe they'll do enough to appease the public but not much more.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I thought I heard a quote from his interview that he said " when you build a company like FB you have to break things". Did he say this? Is this a paraphrase of " to make an omelet"?
-
Zuckerburg: " When you build a company like FB, you have to break a few democracies
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Just a reminder that back then, it seemed to be "cool" to do. ;)https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/facebook-data-scandal-trump-election-obama-2012/ …
-
If you have evidence Obama violated the terms of service or the law, present it. Otherwise, you’re arguing that robbing a bank and withdrawing money front it are the same.
-
So im not entirely sure why there is such an uproar from the media now, when it was known in 2012 already and lauded as a genius stroke. Does that not seem biased to you?
-
The issue is not data analysis. It’s the violation of the terms of service by CA and the allegations that the data was provided to Russia. What Obama did was data analysis and micro-targeting. Those are not the problematic parts of the CA story.
-
The campaign boasted that more than a million people downloaded the app, which, given an average friend-list size of 190, means that as many as 190 million had at least some of their Facebook data vacuumed up by the Obama campaign — without their knowledge or consent.
-
The editorial does claim that but provides no evidence. If the terms of service were violated, present that evidence.
-
So, if I was befriended with someone in 2012 and he used the App from the Obama Party, they had my information, without my consent. Did they sell that Info or give it to a foreign company? I don´t know.
-
“I don’t know” is the operative part. An editorial is just an opinion, it’s not investigative reporting. Somebody thinks Obama did the same as CA in 2012. Without evidence that it’s true, so what?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.