You’re coverage of the #WomensMarch2018 far outweighed any coverage you did of the #MarchForLife that the President spoke at.
And despite all your coverage, CNN still failed to make any mention of the organizers extremist views. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/01/opinion/womens-march-progressives-hate.html …https://twitter.com/thealexvanness/status/954932588577218561 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Better than the March for Life. Hey how bout them job numbers for Ladies? Pretty good huh?
-
FYI Women in US paid 20% less than men for same job. Pretty good, huh? Not
-
Oh Please, not that tired old bromide .





End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
One word answer: No.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Why not equal coverage of the Pro-Life march?
#fakenewsCNN -
You can watch Fox News or OANN
-
So you admit CNN is biased. Telling.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The “Tea Party” was a quarter of the size of the
#WomensMarch and received wall to wall coverage from TV & newspaper media. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Maybe you should ask how well the mass media covered the March for Life?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No, and that’s because news coverage is still determined primarily by men.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is this even a question ? Here's an idea- instead of wasting airtime debating whether or not you covered it, just cover it ffs. And if you think you're making it balanced by showing the 4 Trump voters out of the millions of anti-Trump voters, I've got one word for you -"emails"
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
Brian, do you have any numbers estimates for nationwide and worldwide? Or will you be covering that?
-
Yesterday’s march was 40% smaller than the year before.
-
Data, sources, evidence, please? Not trying to be snarky, just want reliable information. I've not seen any data on this, or any other numbers, other than adding official estimates released.
-
Chicago was larger than last year, it was 1/9 the population of the city
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.