What are these, talking points for ants?! I can barely see them!
-
-
-
No, for worms.
-
More likely, snakes.pic.twitter.com/5loryKjDj1
-
Tweet unavailable
-
None of those quotes are particularly staunch in their opposition... Not too sure it can be said they think the book is trash
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I used to write talking points for RNC. I'd have been embarrassed to put out this kind of stuff.
-
Wouldn’t *anyone* be embarrassed to write *any* talking points for Trump
https://twitter.com/jpitney/status/949656818057297920 … -
That’s a tuff gig.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Rebuttal to the "looseness with the truth" point should simply be to recite the entire quote. Spoiler alert: he's not talking about his own looseness with the truth.pic.twitter.com/OAMBRvr5N7
-
Bingo! Amazing how the skill of reading comprehension doesn’t exist for some.
-
It does, but the GOP knows its audience probably won't buy the book and this is an easy talking point.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Did they forget, “Wolff was so poorly regarded as a journalist that - based on a cover photo & headline he wrote - Trump invited him into the WH where the entire admin let him stay, unquestioned, FOR A YEAR?”
-
The way to Dotard's heart is just a little bit of fluffing.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Written by people who are like really smart.
-
Beg your pardon, but I must provide a correction to your statement: Written by people who are, like, really smart.
-
And stable
-
very stable geniuses
-
Although the some authorities say the plural of genius is genii. Granted, there is literally only one genius of the calibre of Trump
-
Depends which definition you're using, I thinkpic.twitter.com/TYx8cBZfx4
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.