The bigger question for Roy Moore is why then? Why did he pursue sexual contact with teenagers when he was 32?
-
-
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Cosby: “why now” Weinstein: “why now” Spacey: “why now” Sheen: “why now” OReilly: “why now” Ailes: “why now” Moore: “why now” Trump: “why now”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Look at the wave of women who have been stepping forward since the Weinstein story broke. They have a mountain of support lifting them up. "Why now?" Now is the time.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The question is not " why now". The right question is why you did it?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Maybe this isn't the first time they told their stories. Maybe this is the first time someone listened.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Wrong question. Right question is: "Why did you touch a 14-year-old sexually?" To entertain any other question here is moral malpractice and lunacy.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No they didn't Humpty. Why now? Just like the Hollywood leak. And no coverage on menendez trial. No alt left agenda at Wapo. You're a clueless puppet
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No one would lie for political gain or reasons, would they?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How many of Moore's defenders even read the Post story? They simply don't care. They would rather vote for a serial sex offender (POTUS, Senator, whatever) than a Democrat. If that describes you, please step back and really evaluate your life choices at this point.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Hey someone has to finally put these perverts!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So did the fox in the hen house.
@seanhannityThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Moore is disgusting
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Because of
#metoo
because victims are now being heard and supported. Because high ranking politicians shouldn’t be sleaze bags. Because the scars don’t have a statute of limitations. Because - eeew!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
bc they heard it @ a RM supporter rally and harassed 4 women who didn't seek out WaPo? Yes, they sorta did explain their smear. Funny no one's said anything about this for 38 years! And 1 of them is a Jones supporter.
-
Did WaPo retract their smear of RM from 2 days before re: his charity before their recent smear? And that WaPo openly endorses Jones? No one believes either of these stories!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.