I hope you’ll watch the interview, *then* judge if it was informativehttps://twitter.com/laurenduca/status/926919324325081090 …
-
-
My apologies. I still think of you at the Times and I miss David Carr.
-
me too. everyday.
-
I am sorry for your loss. Sincerely.
-
She is a dirty trickster who lies professionally at the pleasure of a dangerous pathological liar. It’s a joke frankly that she gets calls

- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
A hypothetical: is there any point a journalist should refuse to publicize a point of view? Thank you for responding. I appreciate it.
-
A journalist should only publicize an empirically false point of view encapsulated in clear information of its falsehood. i.e. climate deny
-
Thank you. How could someone who wants to be a thoughtful consumer of news learn more things like this? I will promote this info.
-
I have no idea, alas. Read my stuff? My viewpoint is not widely accepted.http://www.nopackagedeals.com/2017/01/08/objective-reporting/ …
-
The assumption that readers can make up their own minds is what made this year so disappointing for me. Taking Everyone else off this rant.
-
People actually are not well equipped to discern between truth and falsehood if media presents them as equal. Humans aren't going to change.
-
agree. It's a q of cognitive load. Making decisions is taxing. People are working hard, raising kids. Media passes the work to reader.
-
I see it in my own consulting work. We charge a bit more than most small firms because we predigest data into clear decision making
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
It's useful but redundant propaganda 24/7 on Faux. Why do you think she will give you anything more than predictable old spin? 1/2
-
Maybe you should watch faux news. All propagandist recite the same line of attacks and for each spin line you should have an answer ready.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Other outlets have decided she’s such a f—king liar they won’t have her on at all. I don’t understand why you haven’t come to that view also
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Come on, Brian - she has no "worldview". I can't even participate in this convo anymore - it's absurd.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Because Trump has trouble getting his world view out? There’s probably no pol in the world whose views have gotten more unfiltered coverage.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
She has no world view it's all about the next lie to cover for the President.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Couldn't watch. Her talking makes me dizzy which is the goal, I'm sure. She & Russians go hand in hand spreading disinformation & confusion
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.