How would @FoxNews cover a Republican president whose former campaign chairman was indicted?
A: "Dems in Disarray"pic.twitter.com/FOI8ha2BVE
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
How would @FoxNews cover a Republican president whose former campaign chairman was indicted?
A: "Dems in Disarray"pic.twitter.com/FOI8ha2BVE
Well, for one, they’d cover it.
They damn sure wouldn't be talking about cheese burgers
They couldn’t handle a tan suit so that should answer that.
FoxNews covered President Obama like he was being indicted everyday for 8yrs. Now they cover Hillary like she’s the President. Brainwashing
As a foreigner, I am endlessly fascinated by the need Americans seem to have to regard Fox as anything more than a well-funded rant tract.
Thinking Americans agree with you. Red state fascists, not so much.
I mean, they're trying to attack a losing Dem nominee because her former campaign chairman's *brother* had some connections...
...to *their own* ex-campaign chairman who got indicted. So I think we have a pretty good idea.
The polar opposite approaches of both FNC & MSNBC remain very troubling to me. Both are largely partisan opinion outlets, not news networks.
Why don’t you put Fox “News” in quotation marks as you should? It’s not news, it’s propaganda.
How do we go about changing FCC rules, so that if a broadcasting network had the name News in it, it must actually have news reporters.
They would be foaming at the mouth.
They'd all strip down and an orgy would ensue.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.