So far, it seems majority of leaks have simply shown us how completely incompetent Trump is. We deserve to know that.
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Sessions can start with
@POTUS who leaked classified info 2 russians in WH and who 'loves wikileaks'. & maybe Mexico & Aust did the leaks? - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
That is the argument of every authoritarian regime to explain/excuse crackdowns on citizens' rights.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Horse feathers. This is first move at suppression of the media.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Like everything with this sad administration, vague language and contradictory statements are being weaponized against truth and openness.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Only one leak put lives at risk and that was when
@POTUS leaked Israeli intelligence to the Russians.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He should crack down on people like Hannity and Co for spreading conspiracy theories destroying lives . I.e. Seth rich
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I keep wondering which leaks put "lives at risk".
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If your boss had said any truthful or reliable statements since he took office, insiders and patriots might not have felt the need to leak.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The post and ny times should turn over the ppl and the docs otherwise they are accomplices in breaking the law!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Only DOJ can do that with marijuana laws and private for profit prisons. Fuck Sessions.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Then reveal your leaker sources and all is well. The media isn't immune from subpoena.
-
Neither is trump's dopey family.
-
Of course not. No one is above the law. Negligence of the law is not an excuse.
-
Actually they are. Legally they aren't required to reveal sources.
-
Anonymous sources are one thing... Those can certainly be protected. If the leaks were obtained illegally though...
-
If the VP gives NYT the nuclear launch codes and NYT reports they have them from a source. NYT cannot be charged.
-
I didn't say 'charge' the media with a crime...
-
That's what this leads to. The media cannot be compelled to reveal a source
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.