Trump/Russia: Irresponsible/ Over-Hyped R's = 89% D=16% . . Indy= 48% (responsible/Proper=27%) This is how D's lose 2018 mid-termspic.twitter.com/nvPjWc5Z16
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Trump/Russia: Irresponsible/ Over-Hyped R's = 89% D=16% . . Indy= 48% (responsible/Proper=27%) This is how D's lose 2018 mid-termspic.twitter.com/nvPjWc5Z16
Well, then 50% of the people are wrong.
Irresponsible, in that it is not harsh enough? If so, then maybe this makes sense. Irresponsible is vague and ambiguous.
Thats not a surprise breathless coverage of trump russia with no evidence is irresponsible. Especially now that we know about DNC servers
It needs more comprehensive coverage
And no one cared about #Watergate. Until they did.
What in the world is the other half doing w/their lives? Do they have $$ on impeachment? Clearly, they aren't actively thinking,curious.
Most Americans thought Watergate was more "politics as usual" than "serious." https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/news/politics/wp/2017/05/15/how-america-viewed-the-watergate-scandal-as-it-was-unfolding/ …pic.twitter.com/Kxgq01iU7i
Considering that Team Trump is just lawyering up now, we are early in this investigation.
Most interesting is reaction of independents/swing voters... otherwise it's party lines.
Keep doing what you do CNN, and continue to drive yourselves into irrelevance... maybe you can be the next MSNBC... maybe...
Horrible summary of the results in that headline.
@Sulliview I felt like all the campaign coverage & not called on lies DT got was irresponsible as was the Wikileaks coverage.
Maybe if you had some proof or testimony under oath said it happened or anything beyond anonymous sources & docs not seen
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.