I don't know what you'd find, but that wasn't the point I made on air. The point was: Trump wrongly described the scope of MRC's study
We'd have to define "negative;" explore the REASONS for skeptical coverage; etc. But my point is intact -- POTUS misspoke about MRC's study
-
-
This is classic
@brianstelter. Hairsplitting over details but ignoring vital substantive issues. -
MRC can expand their study. And let's say they find media only 82% negative.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.