Here media, let me help youpic.twitter.com/0eraZ0UnXX
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
You mean besides the fact they aren't mentioned in the story?
This is incredible to watch Brian. It really is.
there's no defense of original story. None. It contradicts reality without anything approaching the goods to do it
journalism was never a "trust us" enterprise. when contradicting reality, it's particularly impt to show work
i agree. FWIW when I read it, I suspected Perry himself confirmed it on deep background. but NYT obv can't say if so
you suspected that a man with a public record of nuke knowledge confirmed he didn’t know anything about nukes?
The burden of proof is on them, and they're not even HINTED at in original. Also, contradict historical record.
i agree that the burden of proof is on the news outlet. but the leap to say the Times "invented" sources is huge
No denying that the unsubstantiated claim of add’l sources was developed after the publication of original story.
Right. Went from 1 source on record disputing story to several unnamed sources suddenly who don't dispute story
Why weren't sources included in original story then? Easy question.
When, pray tell, do you believe you earned the benefit of the doubt?
. Not named. Not quoted. Plus facts re Perry's previous knowledge of DOE contradict premise of piece
Let's see if Rick Perry can clear this up... .https://twitter.com/willmcavoyacn/status/822133578733588481 …
so why weren't they mentioned originally ?
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.