-
-
What I encounter (obviously anecdotally) on Facebook is that Trump voters (maybe Hillary's too) consume news simply to contradict it.
-
that interests me a lot
-
People complain that when media brings on a "flat-earther" for balance it legitimizes their bs. In fact I think it's good. Let them crash.
-
if their views are actually interrogated, yes. But too often just presented as counterweight only.
-
Yes. I used to enjoy even as a conservative when people with idiotic arguments went up against the likes of Christopher Hitchens.
-
I know not everyone liked him but he was just so good at truly interrogating the other persons argument.
-
We need some more BBC style bring-the-heat from our radio and TV interviewers.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
when people find news so deeply troubling they read more about it. How much countervailing fake news also being read
-
This is exactly the problem. The infowarsing of people "fact checking" the media is an epidemic.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If a person doesn't believe the "news" he is more likely to be a Trump voter than a Clinton Voter. Does CNN make you do False Equivalences?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
