You don't. You impeach him and give the job to a qualified candidate. #TheResistance
-
-
-
Or, maybe you give him actual proof that the Russians are responsible before writing news articles on it.
-
That's what the security briefings he doesn't bother with are for.
-
Weak. Please provide specific proof the Russians were involved with influencing the election.
-
-
So youre the one saying Trump doesn't know everything he needs to, but you don't know what he doesn't know. K.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
There should be an entrance exam for POTUS candidates, including written, physical (and psych). Srsly.
-
@kamikazeecanuck@brianstelter Totally agree. Currently there is virtually no vetting 4 the nation's highest office.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Let's start talking about impeachment -high crimes & possibly treason. Corruption, conflict of interests, lies.Who owns Trump?
-
Is he in pay of, or control of Putin ? Is he a Putin stooge. Nobody knows because he has disclosed nothing.
-
A global kleptocracy has been born.
-
Purge the intelligence folks, continue assault against media, crush dissent wherever it is found. Brownshirts & jackboots soon
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
To discredit CIAs analysis publically is to side with the Russians whose goal is to undermine US intelligence. It's deadly
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Perhaps he just doesn't trust intelligence because he falls short. Call it "business forecasts" instead.
-
Or, maybe it's not intelligence at all and just some bitter CIA agents leaking unsubstantiated claims
-
oh bullshit.
-
Prove it.
-
it's your theory. You prove it. Or not. I don't care.
@brianstelter@politico
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.