That figure is widely known amongst pollsters. Actually, it may be even a bit lower.
-
-
-
it blew me away
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
sounds high to me.
-
and how representative of the population are the 10% that respond?? https://vine.co/v/iLvqdDXPLbI
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
the silent majority hang up on pollsters. They are different from people who will answer personal questions
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@msshreyasen@NateSilver538 Then why bother? It's a crap shoot that carries the assumption of validity.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Which is something he and everyone who does anything with public opinion has known for years.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
what's more shocking is that journos live by polls have never asked that before
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I like this strong interest in facts you seem to have developed post election. Loser.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
…and some could've misled the pollsters. Did this "unscientific" poll before election.https://twitter.com/nwsltrMe/status/795783703221911552 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
sounds like a typical phonebanking response rate.
-
any survey really
-
i guess we're all going to wait until after Election Day to learn the basics of polling, sampling, weighting, etc :(
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
that's fine unless you think there's a difference between those that do vs don't. I say there is.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.