I couldn't agree more. It's one of the main reasons why I don't watch much cable news anymore. Every show is nothing but panels of the same pundits over and over again, giving predictable opinions that don't matter much in the greater scheme of things.
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Totally & completely agree. CNN used to be on 24/7 in my house. Now its only a few minutes a day. So sick of surrogates and the blatant lies. Went to Europe for 11 days. No CNN there. Only had BBC. Rediscovered a whole world of news that CNN no longer reports on. Heaven.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
CNNi is great, especially compared to CNN in the US. Too many surrogates. I get so stressed watching it. Where I was oversaes didn't have CNNi so I had BBC on. And BTW, when I said "blatant lies", I meant from the surrogates, not the anchors/reporters.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
That should go with coverage of any subject. I don't want Trumpsters or Dems spouting the party line no matter how ridiculous it is. I want political scientists and historians giving us realities.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Stated before. Stop w the round tables,the bickering amongst guests,etc. Have a true news story that needs an expert to sort some of the details,fine. But no more that 1. Straight up news,w verifications. If I want talk shows per se,will watch Ellen,or the many others out there.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Jeffrey Toobin is the legal analyst for CNN, but is nothing more than a political hack. I don't think this is going to go the way people think.
-
To be fair, Toobin is a world-class creep.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
TBH this is a rule that should apply across all coverage, not just this one case.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And no longer have people that have signed non-disclosure
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Or just resist the urge to fill entire segments with multibox experts/pundits/‘journalists’ and turn to the camera and soberly report the news. Then, report more. Imagine a CNN hour with lots and lots of small, unflashy news reports. Ahhh.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Amen to this. When New Day or Anderson or Cuomo have two people on either side yelling at each other, I turn the channel. I'm tired of the VOLUME! (All caps on purpose)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
so, which one are you?
-
I give you credit enough to know the answer yourself. If I'm wrong, we both have a problem.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I’ve been thinking about this. And yes information about memory theory and implicit bias would have been a nice addition to the Kavanaugh coverage. But without a class in cognitive psychology, most people would not be able to understand it. Continues.
-
Also, how do you convince someone that implicit bias is a real thing when they’ve never heard of it and don’t believe it exists. I have a psychology degree and these are hard topics for me to explain and I have a background to understand them.
-
And I’d love to see a discussion of how Calvinist theory is part of our national ethos. But unless you know and understand Reformation and church history, it would be over your head.
-
And I know. I think to much. Over educated and under employed. I make no apologies for my education nor my intelligence. However, due to my work history; I’ll never get a job that matches my intelligence. I would love to have work that just involved reading and research.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.