You know what's also unheard of? Senators sitting on sexual assault allegations for six weeks, hiding them from the rest of the Judiciary Committee, waiting until the confirmation hearings are over and then dropping them into the media.
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
What a stunning breach of protocol in this otherwise by-the-book process
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Kavanaugh definitely started this.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Jealous of the interview?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
If accusers one two and three will go ahead and file sexual assault charges before Thursday they will have to rescind his nomination. Let them resend the nomination and then they can withdraw the charges! If they so choose to. You have to one-up them!
-
So why do you think charges haven’t been filed?
-
I think charges haven't been filed yet because they're hoping that the GOP does the right thing. Let the FBI Take 2 weeks investigate the allegations bring the report back and then hold another hearing. And there are witnesses that can corroborate these allegations.
-
He has already been through 6 FBI investigations and found nothing. What is there to investigate when the accuser has no evidence. No date. No time. No place. No witnesses.
-
The accuser does have evidence Accuser number one told her husband as well as her therapist . those people should be investigated and made to tell the FBI. She's not going to mention something in therapy 6 years ago about BK and all of a sudden it's relevant come on think.
-
She told them something happened but never named BK. Ever. Until 2 months ago.
-
She did tell her husband she told him years ago. Not to mention even if she didn't name him by name that's irrelevant, she's naming him now. Apparently she was trying to ask for her to be speaking about it in her marriage counseling session. That's some s*** you never forget.
-
Still Doesn’t prove it was Kavanaugh. It does matter if she never mentioned him by name. Most assuredly. Why then did she not tell her therapist nor her husband until 2012? I am sure something happened 35 years ago but without proof it is she said he said.
- 10 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
It's also unheard of for a network to go from a trusted news outlet to the home of " Creepy Porn Lawyer"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's unheard of for the media to push 35 year old allegations with NO proof, as the truth!
-
Actually it is not unheard of. DEMS have done so many times. They are just getting more clumsy now... very clumsy set up this time.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Total BS. What does the sex of accuser matter? It is the quality of the evidence & tainting of data. All of the coraborative evide is in Kavanaugh's favor. How sexist of you to assume the worse of me based solely on my sex. But that is what liberals do... identity politics.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.