Keyser's lawyer said Saturday night, "Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford." Ford camp says, basically, "that's what we figured she'd say."https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/22/politics/kavanaugh-ford-accuser-nomination/index.html …
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Heres the current evidence in Ford v Kavanaugh: -Ford doesn't know when/where it happened -All 4 people she cites @ party have said they have 0 knowledge of event -Her friend at the party, a Democrat, says she doesn't even know Kavanaugh -Ford only told her therapist 30 yrs later
-
Ford wants FBI investigation, witnesses testifying at hearing , under oath. Kavanaugh and GOP Senators are against both. Why ?
-
They’ve already testified under oath bot. The only person who has not is Ford
-
She wants to testify under oath to the FBI about these allegations. He doesn't. The Senate committee has already demonstrated that he can lie to them with impunity. The FBI can prosecute if he's caught lying to them and Grassley couldn't stop them.
-
He has already “testified” under oath and penalty of perjury regarding this entire ordeal. The only person who has not offered a star,met under the penalty of perjury is Dr. Ford herself!
-
Wrong on every point. He has already lied to Senate confirmation committees, and the Republicans now in charge have proven there will be no consequences for that. Further testimony before them puts him in no jeopardy at all, they've proven they won't hold him accountable.
-
And she has made it perfectly clear she wants the FBI to investigate her claim. How have you missed that?
-
It’s not the FBI’s jurisdiction how have you missed that? The penalty of lying to the committee and the FBI is the exact same. I believe all parties should be heard. It is not Dr. Ford’s time!
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Why won’t Mark Judge testify under oath that he doesn’t remember anything? The only reason would be he’s afraid because he knows he told someone about what happened. And that person might eventually be found. Otherwise he couldn’t possibly get caught in a lie. Who’d he tell?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Same facts, but WaPo & NYT paint them very differentlyhttps://twitter.com/npfandos/status/1043681761723600901 …
-
Facts? The woman has no facts. The only facts indicate that it never happened except in her loony tunes head.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Wow. It’s hard to imagine a better example of “baseless smear by unprincipled reporter.”
-
You mean against Kavanaugh? Yeah. Pretty much unprecedented. If she is lying, and if they check emails they can establish that, there should be criminal penalties and a big defamation suit
-
Emphasizing that Keyser “believes Ford’s accusation” when she also said she never met Kavanaugh and had no memory of the party is intentionally misleading. The three “witnesses” have now ALL substantially denied Ford’s story.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Whoa! As suspected, where's there's one, there's more.
#others#Kavanaugh. Time to give Avenatti MAJOR air time@CNN@MSNBC and yes@FoxNews. Helluva week coming up for@senjudiciarypic.twitter.com/bHTt2UUKWT
-
Bwahahajaja I guess the stormy pimp money is drying up
-
Stormy is a porn actress, no need for a pimp. Get your facts straight. And read her book! Whole new meaning to mushrooms and Yeti Pubes!



pic.twitter.com/ubk7fCJuoy
-
Yes because this is what CNN does now, worn out porn workers doing presidential penis jokes.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.