That is not the story... try harder journalist 
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If David Carr was still with us — and inside the NYT — I suspect he’d be doggedly asking a long list of questions like yours, and making it a personal quest to unmask the senior official.
-
David Carr is greatly missed during times like these.
-
So true, Rob, The masses have no idea of the nuance, but the insiders at NYT are wiping their brows that David won’t be applying his unique, driven inquiry into all of this. David would probably recoil at any notion of an anonymous op-ed, which would likely provoke his reporting!
-
Yes, he was a relentlessly curious and fascinating individual.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Absolutely not, Brian. Surprised that youd even ask the question. The who is not unimportant, but the what is far, far more important and consequential. OTR, especially one as unprecedented as this, binds an ENTIRE publication, not a part of it.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
What I am hoping, Brian is that the NYT does not release the name of the anonymous person that had written the Op-Ed. I hope in good conscience that they don't do this. What good will come of it?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Good questions Brian. The ethics around this, as well as the editorial process, will make a great topic Sunday.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Anonymous means worthless BS. The Woodward book is only helpful if you have an outhouse. The NYTimes can't be believed or trusted anyway. So Anonymous sources means one of their columnists, in a columnist style, wrote the damn thing.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Leave them alone.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I say keep them anonymous and try to get another article out of them further explaining or revealing more details.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why don't you and
@CNN just sue them for the names of the source and then doxx them on live TV? Send a news crew to their kids school. Camp out outside their house and scream at the neighbors? You tried with the Manafort jurors...why have scruples now?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's phony. Even Brian knows that.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Oh, I guess we're supposed to believe you and the
@nytimes that this anonymous source actually exists? Because you clowns have such a great track record for reliability!#EnemyOfThePeople - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Did you ask them if they wrote it?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Could it be possible Mr Trump did this himself
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Go get em Stelcher! I’m sure you want expose this gutless worm. CNN “we make it up”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.