Skip to content
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • Moments Moments Moments, current page.

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
brianstelter's profile
Brian Stelter
Brian Stelter
Brian Stelter
Verified account
@brianstelter

Tweets

Brian StelterVerified account

@brianstelter

Anchor of @ReliableSources and @CNN's chief media correspondent. Formerly @nytimes, @tvnewser and Top of the Morning. Email: bstelter@gmail.com

New York City
brianstelter.com
Joined April 2008

Tweets

  • © 2018 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Jay Rosen‏Verified account @jayrosen_nyu Aug 9

      10/ "We’re not at war; we’re at work" is genius. But its genius is incomplete. It doesn't speak to the problem @Acosta was getting at. If the press is the enemy, that crashes the whole premise of the White House press corps: that we're all trying to inform the American public.

      33 replies 84 retweets 367 likes
      Show this thread
    2. Jay Rosen‏Verified account @jayrosen_nyu Aug 9

      11/ "We’re not at war; we’re at work" wants you to calm down. And when you have to get a story done, or ask a question under the lights, that is good advice. But its emotional intelligence — which is real — has limits, as well. No one in journalism is eager to speak about those.

      1 reply 25 retweets 151 likes
      Show this thread
    3. Jay Rosen‏Verified account @jayrosen_nyu Aug 9

      12/ So I will. There is alive in the United States a campaign to discredit the American press and turn as many people as possible against it. It is led from the top. This campaign is succeeding. Before journalists log on in the morning, about 30% of their public is already gone.

      11 replies 88 retweets 292 likes
      Show this thread
    4. Jay Rosen‏Verified account @jayrosen_nyu Aug 9

      13/ It is not easy to know what to do under these conditions. I certainly don't. But to say "we’re not at war; we’re at work" does not speak to the enormity of the problem. Somehow the press has to figure out how to fight back. Making fun of Acosta's emotional plea isn't helping.

      10 replies 34 retweets 222 likes
      Show this thread
    5. Jay Rosen‏Verified account @jayrosen_nyu Aug 9

      14/ Here's the way I put it in @nybooks. "I think our top journalists are correct that if they become the political opposition to Trump, they will lose. And yet, they have to go to war against a political style in which power gets to write its own story."https://www.nybooks.com/daily/2018/04/25/why-trump-is-winning-and-the-press-is-losing/ …

      5 replies 62 retweets 234 likes
      Show this thread
    6. Jay Rosen‏Verified account @jayrosen_nyu Aug 9

      15/ So what happens if the 30 percent that rejects the mainstream press on principle becomes 40, or 45 because the campaign to discredit the institution is succeeding? Will "we’re not at war; we’re at work" remain as persuasive as it is today? Will it still be drop dead wisdom?

      4 replies 18 retweets 114 likes
      Show this thread
    7. Jay Rosen‏Verified account @jayrosen_nyu Aug 9

      16/ Despite what I have said in challenge to it, I think "we’re not at war; we’re at work" conveys an important truth. Don't play his game. Don't get sucked into a tit for tat. Don't get distracted from your task. These are vital reminders. They make sense. They steady the ship.

      5 replies 24 retweets 180 likes
      Show this thread
    8. Jay Rosen‏Verified account @jayrosen_nyu Aug 9

      17/ Finally... In the degree that "we’re not at war; we’re at work" synchs up with the emotional style preferred within the American newsroom, there is a risk that the wisdom captured in Baron's remark will be over-valued by that room's inhabitants. I write to warn you of that.

      55 replies 35 retweets 227 likes
      Show this thread
    9. Brian Stelter‏Verified account @brianstelter Aug 9
      Replying to @jayrosen_nyu

      I keep asking a version of this Q, including to Baron: If one side is at "war" and the other side is a pacifist, doesn't the pacifist lose?

      11 replies 1 retweet 15 likes
    10. John Schwartz‏Verified account @jswatz Aug 9
      Replying to @brianstelter @jayrosen_nyu

      The Washington Post’s reporting toppled Nixon. They weren’t at war—they were doing their jobs. Good, solid journalism can change the world.

      3 replies 3 retweets 18 likes
      Brian Stelter‏Verified account @brianstelter Aug 9
      Replying to @jswatz @jayrosen_nyu

      i respect that view and i think i share it, but this is just a nagging Q i have, premised on the possibility that the world has fundamentally changed...

      9:03 PM - 9 Aug 2018
      • 5 Likes
      • Deaqon James Rusty James ... #AcostaRocks Christopher Swartout Pamela Colloff
      4 replies 0 retweets 5 likes
        1. New conversation
        2. Gideon Lichfield‏Verified account @glichfield Aug 9
          Replying to @brianstelter @jswatz @jayrosen_nyu

          There's another shortcoming to "we're not at war, we're at work": It doesn't acknowledge the possibility that while we may still be at work, the ~nature~ of the work may have changed, i.e., it requires new techniques, as Jay often says.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        3. Gideon Lichfield‏Verified account @glichfield Aug 9
          Replying to @glichfield @brianstelter and

          A small example: Only recently have media started to recognize that reporting on outrageous false claims can help spread them and give them credibility. That changes how you cover news.

          1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
        4. Gideon Lichfield‏Verified account @glichfield Aug 9
          Replying to @glichfield @brianstelter and

          FWIW, I think a similar basic change should be to stop treating Trump and his administration as synonyms. It's always been taken for granted that what the president says and does is policy. That isn't the case this time.

          1 reply 2 retweets 0 likes
        5. Gideon Lichfield‏Verified account @glichfield Aug 9
          Replying to @glichfield @brianstelter and

          So the danger of "we're not at war, we're at work" is that it can also act as cover for an unthinking continuation of business-as-usual journalism in an era that requires new techniques and hard debates about what purposes different kinds of reporting serve.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        6. Jay Rosen‏Verified account @jayrosen_nyu Aug 13
          Replying to @glichfield @brianstelter @jswatz

          Thanks, Gideon.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        7. 1 more reply
        1. Christopher Swartout‏ @chrisswartout Aug 9
          Replying to @brianstelter @jswatz @jayrosen_nyu

          This is a good exchange, why I don’t log off here for good.

          0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. John Schwartz‏Verified account @jswatz Aug 10
          Replying to @brianstelter @jayrosen_nyu

          I understand the questions that you and Jay are raising, but I also don’t accept the seeming characterization that journalists are blinkered and trudging forward without changing how the job is done to meet these challenges.

          0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. James The Objectivist‏ @Scotty_2017 Aug 10
          Replying to @brianstelter @jswatz @jayrosen_nyu

          "Good, solid journalism can change the world."Just as this is true so too is it true that an industry wrought with bias & corruption can lose its creditability Which is what has happen now & why the term #Fakenews is a powerful tool to wield against those who are corrupt.

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2018 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info