I don’t think the interview came across like you think it did. If I were Glenn I would have walked off the air as well. You lost me as a viewer
-
-
-
Disagree. Glenn did not come on to talk. He said as much! (Let's talk over beer, not here on the air where you have invited me to talk...)
-
He actually did tho, and I don’t even support him. He was trying to stay on topic— and was derailed with personal attacks. His notion of self awareness was spot on. We all need to be more self aware and it’s obvious this is part of the problem.
-
I didn't see it that way. I heard Brian willing to take at least some of the criticism, but Beck went immediately to "Let's not talk about it now." Obviously, we perceived it differently.
-
Yes, agree to disagree. I do wish whatever off air conversation Glenn suggested would be on air— I genuinely want to understand his point of view. We can fix something unless we understand the problem.
-
What a nice, civil, disagreeing conversation.
#weneedmoreofthis - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I also 100% agree with Glenn!! You all thrive off the praise & ratings to the point it only matters who gets the best story to hell with the actual issues..to quote a movie 'you cant handle the truth'!!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I usually enjoy your show, but you clearly had an agenda and did not intend to discuss the planned topic. I’m not one who usually defends GB but I would have walked out too. Your facial expressions were embarrassing. Acting surprised?
-
Then Brian gets all upset and weepy when people call them fake news and say they don't trust the media. It's like they just don't have the ability to listen or learn
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Seriously Brian, take your vacation. Now. I watch
@CNN and your program regularly, you are overexposed. The "interview" was a series of interruptions. Relax & then come back and re-interview@glennbeck. -
How about never interviewing him in the first place? There is no need for "the other side" to get more airtime on CNN: the both sides but more right side network that helped get trump elected.
-
CNN hasn't been 'the both sides" network in over a decade, but you're right. They helped get Trump elected. Helping already with 2020 too.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
That was unbelievably bizarre. Did Glenn seriously ask you why the media wasn’t coming up with solutions? I don’t know, because they aren’t the government? Glenn is off his meds again. Blaming media & not the president? Blaming the people trying to keep the lies straight? FFS
-
I thought the exact same thing! Media is reporting, not solving problems!
-
I think Glenn is angling to get back on Fox. There’s no reason to give an interview like that disconnected with that much reality without an ulterior motive. Sad.
-
Agreed. Glenn is willing to say whatever will get him listeners/viewers. Embarrassed to admit it, but he had me fooled for quite a while.
-
I agree, also. Seems he was purposely abusive & unreasonable.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.