This is bollocks @brianpaddick. This issue goes to the heart of trusting the police with data retention and destruction of evidence. It should have been destroyed after the 2008 case but a cop kept his own private copy of the data #DamianGreenhttps://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/dec/22/damian-green-case-former-police-officers-public-interest-brian-paddick?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Tweet …
Chris Pounder, an expert in data protection laws, said: “You could argue it was in the public interest the information was disclosed, because Mr Green was dismissed at the end of the day.” Maybe not bollocks? My understanding - they didn’t retain data. They made notes.
-
-
Evidence does disappear from police other official storage and why in anything official get the proof the evidence was there to begin with esp if you suspect they will delete destroy and deny and or matter is passed to HO under counting rules MP's want to cover up embezzle etc..
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.