Agreed Claire. It’s the fact of ten years passing that’s odious and an officer retaining info for personal gain that stinks. If the original investigation was happy not an illegal act why on earth keep the “legal” data/info that’s inexcusable and reflects very badly on the force
No but I’ve already suggested Quick may have been motivated by revenge, which, if true, would be reprehensible.
-
-
I bet you wish you never got involved in this one BP!

-
It’s a marathon!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
