'Concern over Met police use of spit hoods on black detainees'https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/sep/02/concern-over-met-police-use-of-spit-hoods-on-black-detainees?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Tweet …
-
-
From what I've been told previously it is sometimes used pre-emptively, eg based on DP's behaviour &/or threats
-
No knowledge but I do not support preemptive use of spit hoods. Disproportionate in my view to hood someone who has not already spat.
-
If you may be interested, this was my take a year ago, since when things have moved on a bit http://www.police-foundation.org.uk/news/216/187/Spit-hoods-a-question-of-transparency/d,Blog … main
#spithoods -
Also this summary of the evidencehttps://twitter.com/gmhales/status/865129229901582336 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
We can use lethal force pre emptively, why is reasearch needed to determine If a spit hood is OK when someone threatens to spit?
-
For example, because they could make some suspects more violent resulting in more harm and use of force.
-
If they were to make someone more violent then we have the powers and equipment to deal with that. It's not a reason not to protect officers
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The research on public/media perception is a different topic than legitimacy of safety
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
