The surveillance law is a threat to criminals, not privacy | Brian Paddick http://gu.com/p/4vxbe/tw via @guardian
-
-
Replying to @brianpaddick
@brianpaddick@guardian All law must be at very least discussed extensively. Not rushed through. Your complacency, staggering.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @theNewsfox
@theNewsfox Not complacent. Convinced by the need for urgency. But law dies 31/12/2016 so we can review everything in slower time.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @brianpaddick
@brianpaddick Elites don't care about our safety. They risked Iraq, knowing that it would increase chance of attacks at home.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @theNewsfox
@theNewsfox And the Lib Dems were the only major party to oppose Iraq.
8:04 AM - 15 Jul 2014
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.